This picture shows you the church of ERP. As opposed to what some think, ERP is not new: it’s a village in Holland that was born around 1300.
This, and many other things, I learned at a Microsoft’s seminar for software companies and ISV’s on December 10th in Brussels. ERP guru Guus Krabbenborg from Terdege entertained the audience with an overview of recent (not like the village) ERP trends, both from the perspective of software companies and from endcustomers.
It appeared to me that Microsoft’s platfrom message, which Guus brought with enthousiasm, is generally accepted by almost everyone, both the audience present and the ISV market in general. I think any software company that now or recently started building their own accounting, ERP or CRM solution from scratch, might have to reconsider if they really took the right decision. And most ISV’s who have been active on the markt since many years with their own ERP of CRM solution, are now at least considering to migrate their solution to a standard platform like SAP, Oracle or Microsoft Dynamics. It not only guarantees the continuity of their solution, but also allows to focus on their real added value and not on building horizontal functionalities, as indicated Guus still-working on-his-website Krabbenborg.
The most interesting part of the seminar was probably the interactive discussion at the end of the presentation. Microsoft (unsurprisingly) is opposed to custom-made software solutions. Guus Krabbnborg stated that ERP customers should analyze and adapt their processes when implementing a new ERP solution, in order to keep the final solution as standard as possible. The result is that an ERP project is not an IT project, we all concluded, but an organizational and change management process in the first place.
Which raised the remark in the audience that companies – especially SMB’s- are not ready to pay for ‘change management’ or ‘consultancy’. They are ready to pay for results tomorrow from the investment they make today. This is the exact reason why consultancy firms are now suffering more than others from the crisis, said someone in the audience.
There is evidently a mismatch between what implementors of business software are promising and what endcustomers are expecting from their new solution. The ones are promising too much, and the others are expecting too much. Software implementators should say ‘no’ to their potential customers more often. Just as a car dealer should not sell a Porsche 911 Turbo to someone who always drove a Skoda before: he requires that he takes driving courses first.
Endcustomers, on the other hand, should lower their expectations and understand that an ERP project is not unlike building a new company building: it takes 2 years before it’s finished. Managers should reconsider their value scale about investing. There is something not logical about a CEO buying a € 50,000 BMW every 4 years for him alone, while he hesitates to invest he same amount in an ERP project that can benefit the whole company – including change management.